Defence Industry

200 Combat Jets: Will F-16 / Gripen and FGFA go Hand-in-Hand?
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
Issue Net Edition | Date : 03 Nov , 2016

Saab Gripen

India’s offer to buy 200 foreign combat jets if they are ‘Made-in-India’ has hit headlines. This announcement after concluding the deal for importing 36 x Rafale fighter jets in flyaway condition ex France has caused much excitement for the single-engine, medium fighters to be built here. This deal could be anything from US$13 billion to US$15 billion. And, the actual requirement may go up since making up the IAF’s shortfall through Make-in-India would take considerable number of years that could see more existing holdings of IAF phased out.

Lockheed Martin and Saab have been actively marketing the F-16 Block 70 and the Gripen E respectively, both of which are single-engine.

Presently the IAF is down to 32 operational squadrons against the 45 required. Though IAF has ordered 140 of the indigenous single-engine fighter Tejas, only two have been have been delivered to-date to IAF and there are multiple issues that still need to be overcome.

As per media reports, America’s Lockheed Martin has responded in the affirmative to an IAF letter to global aerospace vendors, soliciting interest in building a single-engine, medium fighter aircraft in India, with full transfer of technology (ToT). Sweden’s Saab has also said it is ready to not only produce its frontline Gripen fighter in India, but help build a local aviation industry base. Lockheed Martin and Saab have been actively marketing the F-16 Block 70 and the Gripen E respectively, both of which are single-engine. Boeing’s F/A-18 E/F and Eurofighter of the European consortium appear to be out of the race since these are twin-engine fighters, not single engine.

By all accounts, Lockheed Martin has also offered to close down its only F-16 production line from the US to India. This implies that once the production line comes to India, all future F-16s and large share of the spare parts and sub-systems for every F-16 flying across the globe would come from India; India will then be the global hub for F-16s. Lockheed Martin says, “Our offer is not for just building a hundred F-16s in India; or even another hundred F-16s for the export market. The real value would come from the tens of thousands of spare parts, components, sub-systems and systems that would sustain the 3,200-plus F-16s still flying in the US, and in 24 other countries”, adding, “Transferring the line to India will make the F-16 even cheaper. And that will bring in even more export orders.”

India and Russia have already inked military deals worth Rs 60,000 crore during the BRICS summit held in Goa. Now, Russia is hoping to get another order on FGFA by end of the current year.

Presently, Lockheed Martin is left to deliver only 15 x F-16s of the 4,588 x F-16s ordered over the years albeit Bahrain and some West Asian countries have been evincing interest in this fighter aircraft. The company now wants to build the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter in the US. But significantly, the US Air Force plans to operate its late-model F-16s (Block 40 and Block 50 versions) for another 30 years, till 2045. Transferring the production line to India will imply the F-16s of USAF too will be supplied spares and replacement assemblies from India. The F-16 Block 70 reportedly flies faster, climbs quicker and carries more armament than most fighters in its class. It has 1,500 kilometres comparable to the much bigger Rafale, and with heavier air-to-ground weaponry for strike missions, the radius of action is still 700 kilometres.

But Saab too has offered a rival production line for its Gripen aircraft. Jan Widerström, Chairman and Managing Director, Saab India Technologies says, “We are very experienced in transfer of technology – our way of working involves extensive cooperation with our partners to establish a complete ecosystem, not just an assembly line.” It appears that Lockheed Martin and Saab will be the two contestants in the mega single-engine fighter deal for the IAF. The IAF of course can be expected to go for which of the two fighter jets meets its requirements best.

At the same time, India needs to speed up development of the FGFA jointly with Russia.  In February, India and Russia had revived talks on the delayed FGFA project after the defence minister approved the deal. The fifth-generation fighter jet will be on par with the capabilities of Russia’s PAK-FA T-50 aircraft, a fifth-generation fighter, but since the jet will be designed over the next few years, it is likely to exceed in some specifics – better than Russia’s PAK-FA T-50.

According to Sergi Chemezov, CEO of Russia’s Rostech State Corporation “The agreement has been completed on our end; we are ready to sign it. It is now down to the Indian side. There are some formalities to figure out, but I think it will be signed by the end of this year”. He added, “The FGFA project will produce a state of the art fighter jet, and it will be the result of the work on Russia’s most modern technology done by both Russian and Indian engineers. As Fifth Generation, it means fifth generation speed, ballistics and military equipment, avionics and stealth capabilities among other qualities.”

Speed will definitely be required considering the China-Pakistan dual threat which appears to be enlarging…

India and Russia have already inked military deals worth Rs 60,000 crore during the BRICS summit held in Goa. Now, Russia is hoping to get another order on FGFA by end of the current year. Under the new offer, India will need to contribute US$3.7 billion instead of US$6 billion towards technological know-how and some three prototypes of the fighters.

During the recent India-Russia Intergovernmental Commission on Military and Technical Cooperation co-chaired by Defence Minister Mohan Parrikar and Russian Defence Minister Sergie Shoigu the FGFA project and upgrades of SU-31 aircraft in service with the IAF were discussed. Development of the single-engine, medium fighter whether F-16 Block 70 or Gripen E will apparently come up faster in the county, but simultaneously India must hasten development of the FGFA considering the years it would take to field these aircraft coupled with the mounting China-Pakistan threat.

Speed will definitely be required considering the China-Pakistan dual threat which appears to be enlarging, China’s strategic pairing with Pakistan to keep India constrained within South Asia, PLA’s strategic lodgement in Gilgit-Baltistan, the CPEC, and Chinese designs on the IOR.

China recently showcased two of its advanced J-20 stealth fighters in a fly-over at an air show in Zhuhai, Guangdong province of China. The J-20 is a long-range radar-evading fighter jet equipped with air-to-air missiles, resembling Lockheed Martin’s F-22 Raptor. China has reportedly built six prototypes of this FGFA. China is also developing the J-31 which is supposed to sequel American F-35 Lightning II. Only US, Russia and China presently have FGFA.

Rate this Article
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
The views expressed are of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of the Indian Defence Review.

About the Author

Lt Gen Prakash Katoch

is a former Lt Gen Special Forces, Indian Army

More by the same author

Post your Comment

2000characters left

7 thoughts on “200 Combat Jets: Will F-16 / Gripen and FGFA go Hand-in-Hand?

  1. Think before you leap. Gripen has American engine and electronics, hence US will gleefully stop the spare supply when it suits them. Moreover, this plane has not fired a single shot in anger and be shot at by adversary.

    The F-16, may this plane is old design with no stealth but it is the best in the lot of all fighters. For the last 25 years, it has fought battled all over globe.

    You should also consider that standard of 45 squadron was set in 1991. Since then the planes are far more capable making a large number of them unneccassry. The world air forces have slimmed down but writers in India still continue to harp in legacy views. All the planes India is acquiring after MIG-21 and a few others retired are very modern and big numbers are unneccassry.

  2. If there is war between India and Pakistan in near future, this is what India is going to do. They will break Pak into four parts including separate Baluchistan as a independent country. Otherwise it will be very difficult by way of just invading it or supporting Baluchistan insurgents which are too less in number to carry out there activities.

    • India will never capture another country and post a puppet Govt like the USA and Russia has done. We can capture Pakistan like we capture East Pakistan in 1971. But at that time India was able to get a leader like Shiek Mujbubur Rahaman acceptable to the majority of Bangladeshis. But it is very difficult to get a leader like Mujbubur Rahaman in Pakistan. So war is not going to solve the problem. First, we should secure our border. with a modern surveillance system with five layer barbed wires. Those who are staying within 40 km from Line of control should have underground shelter and schools. Artillery range is 40 Km. Water will be our weapon. Automatically Pakistanis will come under control. They may go to the international court of justice. If the judgment is not in favour we should follow Chinese path. No one can do anything against us, We are a military and nuclear power like China. Our navy is bigger than British navy.

    • Dear you know for a guerrilla war you need small loyal force, if Russia and US can not win guerrilla war then how a begger and flawed pak can win. India and US must support Baloch fighters to counter Taliban and anti India LET

  3. Way dose India wants to build American Aircrafts at all let alone build them in India is it to make money for the Americans. I would advise India to keep away from building anything that is American did they help you to build up your space program or did they try to ruin your programs by Sanctions.

    prem

  4. This article is based on outdated information . It appears that the author has not read an article an article “Part Five: Air War in the West” . on the net. So the 44 squadrons came from PAF.
    Link
    eashttp://freeindia.org/1971war/skies_west.html
    So kindly ready the above article before writing iAF requirements.in future.
    In the 1971 war, IAF achieved air superiority with 20 squadrons using Gnat fighter aircraft. Hunter was a failure. IAF used 14 squadrons in the East Pakistan. Now there is no East Pakistan. Now IAF has got world class fighter Aircraft with GPS . One has to read the experiences of Gnat fighter Pilots. Wireless communication failure was frequent. Even dash light illumination in the Gnat was so poor pilot has to use a torch to see the fuel gauge. The pilot has to watch the fuel gauge as the range was limited .to a compact radius of 172 km. Now Tejas has got compact radius up to 500 km. The present strength of IAF is 560 front line fighters excluding Mig- 21.
    So we have 35 squadrons as per IAF Wikipedia.
    In the year 2017 -2018.IAF has to withdraw Mig – 27 from service. IAF has to withdraw 115 Jaguar from service. So within three years we require 202 fighter planes. In absence of GPS IAF used two fighter planes to conduct Sorties ( Front gunner and rear gunner). Now all the fighter planes can conduct sorties individually .But the difference officers are always blaming the civilian Government like opposition blaming the Government. Complete transfer of technology has no meaning . Will they manufacture engine, weapons, radar and connected avionics in India? Will they allow to fit Indian missiles and radar in their plane? Russians raised an objection to fit Bramohos in Su-30 Mki.

More Comments Loader Loading Comments