The fast enlarging Navy of Japan’s Self Defence Forces has already 17 conventional diesel submarines of the Harushio, Uzushio and Yuushio class armed with US Harpoon missiles. In addition, Japan’s Navy consists of 7 guided missile destroyers, and 55 frigates again, armed with the Harpoon missile as well as embarking Sea King helicopters. Moreover, she has 87 P-3C Orion aircraft as part of her 10 maritime patrol squadrons. Japan has also ordered 4 Aegis class destroyers (7200 tons) with Harpoons and advanced electronics and 6 AWACS and other airborne electronic and missile systems in order to ensure that her sealanes of communication for her merchantmen are not interfered with on the high seas.
Editor’s Pick |
In the early eighties, China adopted a new strategy called People’s War under modem conditions for upgrading her defence forces by acquiring sophisticated weapons and long range ballistic missiles. According to the Military Balance, China has 47 submarines including nuclear ballistic submarines, 18 guided missile destroyers and 38 frigates with helicopters and missiles. Her coastal vessels comprise 215 missile craft, 160 torpedo craft and 495 patrol boats. Her Naval Air Force consists of 25000 personnel. Her 3 Fleets, North, East and South Sea Fleets are headquartered at Quingdao, Shanghai and Zhanjiang respectively.12 There appears to be a requirement for inducting sea control ships either built in China or acquired from Russia.
Chinas share of Asian Defence expenditure has therefore increased from 10.58 per cent to 11.8 per cent.
China did not hesitate to occupy the disputed Paracel Islands in 1974 and declared her intention to recover the Spratleys as also the Senkaku islands which are presently under Japanese control. The 25 million overseas Chinese lend economic and moral strength for China to possess a credible maritime force in the Asia-Pacific region. Beijing intends to further improve the Karakoram highway to Pakistan which will eventually connect China to seaports in the North Arabian Sea. This can be both a strategic perception as also a trade requirement to support her maritime policies and perceptions of having access to ports in the underbelly of South Asia. Her interest in Mynamar is similarly to revive the famous Burma Road which runs from Kuming to Lashio as also the Stillwell Road from Myitkina to Ledeo in the North Eastern state of Assam.
In the context of the maritime perceptions it will be of interest to analyse Indias maritime perceptions and naval plans in consonance with her strategic thinking for the twenty-first century.
China is also assisting Myanmar to update her existing communication facilities from the Southern Chinese province of Yunnan to Yangon (Rangoon) through Mandalay. Beijing appears keen to modernize the ports at Sittwe near the Bangladesh border and Mergil on the Thai border as also Haingyi island in the Bay of Bengal for facilitating Chinese trade and commerce. In addition, radar stations have been upgraded in the Great Coco Island in the North Andaman group. China’s share of Asian Defence expenditure has therefore increased from 10.58 per cent to 11.8 per cent. In 1993, General Zhao Nangi of the Chinese Academy of Military Sciences stated that ‘the PLA Navy would extend its naval operations into the Indian Ocean to prevent India from dominating these waters’. He added that ‘this is something we cannot accept as we are not prepared to let the Indian Ocean become India’s ocean’.
A distinguished banker has suggested a scheme whereby the Indian shipyards could draw bills on the Navy which on their acceptance by the drawee, i.e., the Navy and countersigned by financial institutions or banks could become ‘securitized paper’. Such a scheme could be fitted into the industrial bill discounting scheme say of the Industrial Development Bank of India (IOBI) as ship building is rightly regarded as an industry for this purpose. The shipyard could then get working capital credit from the financial institutions during construction and on delivery draw medium-term bills of say 6 to 8 years which could be discounted. The rate of interest would need to be on commercial terms.
The illegal transfer of arms and fissionable uranium together with the spread of fundamentalism, technological bullying and nuclear discrimination has attracted self-appointed policemen to interfere in the internal governance of some weaker states.
But if the Navy finds the interest on commercial terms to be burdensome, a subsidy out of naval appropriations could be considered as has been the practice in some developing Asia-Pacific countries. This would result in the shipyards being kept busy while at the same time, the Navy could get the majority of its warships and submarines from within the country thereby adding to the incomes and employment for a sizeable segment of her industrial sector.
But budgetary allocations continue to suffocate naval development as seen from the defence expenditure which declined markedly from 3.59 per cent of the GDP in 1987-88 to 2.47 per cent in 1992-93. It then increased to 2.53 per cent in 1994-95. But the devaluation of the rupee also had an effect on the purchasing power of this defence expenditure. Moreover the defence budget for 1994-95 allotted 11. 9 per cent to the Navy as against the average figure of about 13 per cent during the past decade.13 The Arun Singh Committee had proposed that the inter-service ratio of 57:30:13 should be marginally adjusted to arrive at a ratio of 50:30:20 for the Army, Air Force and Navy in order to give a more symmetrical force structure to Indian peninsular architecture.
This will no doubt require the Indian Navy to evolve fresh doctrines, restructure training, indoctrinate personnel as also expand the objectives of Indian sea forces as also her merchant, hydrographic and fishing fleets. India has already taken the initiative to hold joint naval exercises with over a dozen navies to encourage open-mindedness and transparency of information on a reciprocal basis.
The global trend for liberalization, both politically and economically, has also lent itself to a new oceanic approach where maritime forces will need to diffuse the existing psychology for “˜preparing for war in order to ensure peace which in a way was the colonial and cold war theme
Delhi has also offered to cooperate with regional countries in combating narcotics whose stakes have increased to $ 400 billion according to Interpol. This laundering of money and allied narco-terrorism has brought in its wake a certain amount of instability to this region. The illegal transfer of arms and fissionable uranium together with the spread of fundamentalism, technological bullying and nuclear discrimination has attracted self-appointed policemen to interfere in the internal governance of some weaker states. Nonetheless, India has delineated maritime boundaries and has proposed joint maritime centres for combating marine pollution and environmental degradation.
Parliament is seized with the need to keep a close watch on the emerging scramble for resources, such as oil, food, water and non-renewable energy to diffuse conflicts such as in Somalia, Sudan, Eritrea, Ruanda, Cambodia, West Iran, East Timor and the province of Acah. Even this limited maritime cooperation has significantly reduced in-built prejudices and instead encouraged direct contact between littoral and world navies. There have been programmed meetings between maritime forces of the Asia-Pacific region in which India, Australia and the US (with South Africa and France to follow) have played a credible role in using the medium of the oceans for bringing nations and people together. Whether the twenty first century is the decade of the Pacific or the Indian Ocean is perhaps irrelevant. But it is clear that the next century will be that of the oceans requiring a spectrum of innovative measures for preventing and resolving conflicts in every corner of our water planet which paradoxically is called Earth.