Military & Aerospace

Effects of Covert and Clandestine Operations on International Peace and Security
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
Issue | Date : 21 Feb , 2015

To understand the topic better, let us first understand few terminologies with respect to the topic.

Covert Operation – A covert operation is defined as an operation conducted by armed services, intelligence or law enforcement that is often conducted without using the official channels. While conducting covert operations the identity of the sponsors, individuals or groups, who carry out the operation, are kept classified.

Covert operations are used in those situations where conducting an open operation will backfire and at most attract major attention, rather criticism from the general public and leaders worldwide.

Clandestine Operation – A clandestine operation is defined as an armed services, intelligence or law enforcement operation which is carried out in a manner that it goes unnoticed. However in special occasions, an operation can be both covert and clandestine in nature.

Through this column, let us understand the effects of covert and clandestine operations on international security.

Covert Operation

Understanding the Basics

Covert action can be broadly classified into three: propaganda, paramilitary operations, and political action.

Propaganda is to deliver a specific message or viewpoint to the general public. Paramilitary operations involve training, equipping and supporting Special Forces operatives in target countries. Political action involves supporting and influencing a particular party or the leader of the party of a target nation. It also involves influencing government officials, election results, economic results and civic communities.

Covert operations are used in those situations where conducting an open operation will backfire and at most attract major attention, rather criticism from the general public and leaders worldwide. These operations are mostly illegal. Sometimes these operations are conducted in support of allies and friends to ensure support in controversial part of the foreign policy.

The fact that “Covert operations are illegal” if conducted in a target nation is itself controversial in nature. Although many governments spy on their allies and enemies, maintaining a policy of complete anonymity on this.

With the advancements in technology, nations have now better ways to conduct cover operations. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are very helpful when it comes to reconnaissance. However, these armed UAVs have mostly been used in strike operations.

The fact that “Covert operations are illegal” if conducted in a target nation is itself controversial in nature.

With the help of few examples of covert operation conducted by nations we will understand the topic better. The example does not contain exact details of the operations as they were classified; anonymity was maintained even years after it was conducted.

Operation Eiche

After the invasion of Allied forces in Sicily, Italian government collapsed. The then premier of Italy, Mussolini was arrested and imprisoned by then King Emmanuel of Italy. He was imprisoned at the Campo Imperatore Hotel in Italy’s Gran Sasso.

Otto Skorzeny, a highly trained German Para commando, was personally selected by Hitler to carry out a covert rescue mission. Otto then intercepted a coded message by the Italians mentioning the whereabouts of Mussolini. Skorzeny along with the Luftwaffe paratroopers crashed their gliders in the mountains, before rescuing the primer without a single fired shot. Mussolini received a hero’s welcome at Hotel Imperial in Austria.

As the operation was conducted before the birth of the United Nations and during a time of war international attention wasn’t recorded on the issue.

Capture of Adolf Eichmann

Adolf Eichmann, the perpetrator behind the “Final solution” was a German member of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nazi). He was the man responsible for handling the mass deportation of Jews to concentration camps in Europe.

Operation Neptune Spear was carried out by the permission of President Barack Obama. This was a joint CIA – US Navy SEAL’s operation. The objective of this operation was to eliminate the lone wolf Osama Bin-Laden, head of the terrorist organization Al Qaeda.

After the war, he escaped to Argentina. He worked in a Mercedes Benz factory till 1960. Mossad Agents captured him and he was deported to Israel, where he faced a trial on many criminal charges: war crimes and crimes against humanity were some few. He was found guilty and was later sentenced to death.

In June 960, angered by this operation, Argentina requested to call for an urgent meeting of UNSC as “the incident had violated their sovereignty”. The UNSC then adopted the Resolution 138, which re stated the capture as “a violation of the sovereignty of the Argentine Republic”.

Operation Wrath of God

This covert operation (official name: Mivtza Za’am Ha’el) was carried out by Mossad agents of Israel, to assassinate the individuals or groups, directly or indirectly involved in the Munich massacre of 1972, where Israeli athletes participating in the Summer Olympics were taken hostage and eventually killed, by the Black September, a Palestinian group.

The operations, which are believed to be conducted for more than two decades, Israeli assassination (commonly known as kidon) units assassinated many, who they found suspected of being responsible. Assassinations happened across Europe and Latin America. In 1973, a military assault, involving Israeli Defence Force Special Forces and Mossad agents took place in Lebanon, killing many top leaders of PLO.

This operation invited a worldwide criticism as not only a sovereignty of a nation was breached, but also boots on a sovereign ground was violation of many UN protocols. In 1973, the Mossad agents compromised their operation when they killed a civilian, a Moroccan waiter in Lillehammer, Norway. This resulted in the capture of many Mossad agents; however they were released in 1975. This rocked the seat of Prime Minister Golda Meir as she was forced to suspend the operation, amid global criticism.

Operation Neptune Spear

This operation was carried out by the permission of President Barack Obama. This was a joint CIA – US Navy SEAL’s operation. The objective of this operation was to eliminate the lone wolf Osama Bin-Laden, head of the terrorist organization Al Qaeda. On May 2011 a surgical strike was conducted by the SEALs, in Abbottabad, killing Bin Laden.

This operation was a clear violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty. The then Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani while speaking in the UNSC said: “Our people are rightly incensed on the issue of violation of sovereignty as typified by the covert U.S. air and ground assault on the Osama hideout in Abbottabad. The Security Council, while exhorting UN member states to join their efforts against terrorism, has repeatedly emphasized that this be done in accordance with international law, human rights and humanitarian law.”

Although amid heavy reactions from Pakistan, the United Nations Security Council applauded the result and warned the extremist groups to stop their activities. Nations came in; pouring with appreciation to the US and allied efforts, but many criticized this move and felt that regardless of the target, covert activities need to be dealt with in a very strict manner.

The public opinion is mostly focussed on its effectiveness: does the drone strike eliminate terrorists more than the civilian’s or is it the other way round? However the debate still lacks strategic understanding and framework.

Eliminating Threats using UAV

The US first used an armed drone in 2002, when they were targeting a group of armed insurgents in Somalia. A US Predator Drone armed with hellfire rockets targeted a moving vehicle suspected to be rigged with explosives in the Mar’ib province of Yemen. Almost 6 people including 3 children were killed in the attack.

Out of the 6 casualties, one was reported to be an American national. Among the dead were the nation’s most wanted al Qaeda operatives, wanted in connection of October 12, 2000 bombing of the USS Cole which took lives of over 12 US sailors.

Two years later Nek Muhammad Wazir, a high level Al Qaeda commander was killed in a drone strike in the Northwest Province of Pakistan. Wazir was also wanted by the Interpol for harbouring al Qaeda and Taliban operatives. He had recently signed a ceasefire agreement, but he claimed the agreement to be modified benefitting the infidels; as the meeting grew inconclusive, a U.S. drone killed Wazir.

Following the incident, drone attacks in many regions of Pakistan increased. Under Bush Administration, a drone would carry out attacks in every 40 days; under the Obama’s leadership, drone attacks grew rapidly from 40 days to 4 days. Those in the senate defence committee applauded the programs as “every terrorist it kills, numerous lives are saved”.

However rapidly increase in drone attacks resulted in distorted relationship of America with Islamabad. However situation worsened when, Raymond Davis, a man who was later identified as a CIA contractor picking targets for the drones to strike, killed two Pakistani men during a “less anticipated mugging” in Lahore, 2011 . As the incident fired up, many Pakistani citizens walked came on the streets and protested. Surprisingly during his arrest and his trials, the drone attacks were suspended. The drone attacks resumed on the day Davis was released.

After 2011, lethal drone strikes have been carried out in Yemen and Somalia, simultaneously eliminating suspected terrorists in Iraq, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.

…Iran-contra affair was a secret arrangement of 1980s whose objective was to funding to the Nicaraguan contra rebels from profits gained by selling arms to Iran.

Despite its growing expansion, the topic is discussed very often: yes it kills suspected terrorist, but does this killing actually contribute in reducing their numbers and threat prospective of the terrorist organization? The question remains unanswered.

The public opinion is mostly focussed on its effectiveness: does the drone strike eliminate terrorists more than the civilian’s or is it the other way round? However the debate still lacks strategic understanding and framework.

Clandestine Operation

The Iran – Contra Affair

The infamous Iran-contra affair was a secret arrangement of 1980s whose objective was to funding to the Nicaraguan contra rebels from profits gained by selling arms to Iran. The affair was a result of two separate phases under the then President Ronald Reagan. The first phase aimed to provide funding to the Nicaraguan rebels who were conducting guerrilla war against the then Sandinista government of Nicaragua. The second phase was assisting the “liberals” in the Iranian government and securing the release of American hostages captured by the pro Iranian groups in Lebanon and to influence the foreign policy of Iran in a pro Western direction.

Inspite having a strong opposition, the Democratic majority in the congress called for a meet and enacted the legislation which later came to be known as the Boland amendments, which prohibited Defence Department, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and any intelligence department from assisting the contras, from December, 1983, till September, 1985. Shocked by the enactment, the Reagan administration dissolved the duration of the enacted legislation using the National Security Council (NSC), which was not included in any law supervising their deal with the contras. Robert McFarlane (1983–85) and John Poindexter (1985–86) of the NSC raised private funds through offshore accounts. This operation was supervised by NSC member Lt. Col. Oliver North. McFarlane and North are also presumed to be the central figures in shipping arms and weaponry system to Iran amid trade and arms sanctions.

Troubled came heavily on Regan Administration, when a Lebanese news paper forced the Regan administration to explain the arms deal of November 1986. The whole situation backfired.

Troubled came heavily on Regan Administration, when a Lebanese news paper forced the Regan administration to explain the arms deal of November 1986. The whole situation backfired. Poindexter was forced to resign in a month while North was fired. The Congressional Select Committee appointed Lawrence E. Walsh as the special prosecutor to investigate the affair. Top administration officials, especially Reagan, Vice President Bush, and William J. Casey (former director of the CIA, who died under mysterious circumstances in May, 1987), were implicated but the prosecutor didn’t found enough evidence in the court. In an interview North said that Reagan was well aware of the situation, and the prosecutor’s report of 1994 also stated that both Reagan and Bush were aware of the “cover up”. As expected Reagan and Bush both denied any involvement and no evidence could be found indicating their role. A presidential commission was critical of the NSC; however congressional hearing did reveal official deception, mismanagement, and illegality.

Besides McFarlane, North, and Poindexter many convictions were made, but North’s and Poindexter’s were given a leave of absence as they had signed immunity deals with the senate and the State Department. Many CIA officials were found guilty for withholding information about the Contra affair, and Caspar Weinberger, defence secretary under Reagan, was also found guilty for withholding the information. In 1992, the then President Bush pardoned Weinberger and other officials who were charged with obstructing in a federal case or withholding critical information from the congress. Although Iran Contra affair raised serious questions about the nation’s foreign policy and factions influencing the policy.

Plan Columbia

A Washington Post investigative report stated that “Since the early 2000s, the CIA has been secretly helping the far-right Colombian government torture, spy on, and kill at least two dozen members of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) in a clandestine program with a “multibillion dollar black budget” approved by Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama”.

The report further states that “drawing on interviews with over 30 present and former U.S. and Colombian officials, most of who spoke on condition of anonymity because the CIA operations are still ongoing”. The report also revealed a hidden program “Plan Colombia, which started its operations in 2001 and has till now consumed over $9 billion mostly in the form of military aid.

The “War on Terror” categories these operations as clandestine.

A separate assistance program beside “Plan Columbia” was the supplying of GPS equipment “that transforms a less than accurate 500 pound gravity bomb into a highly accurate smart bomb,” and directly using it target high level FARC personnel’s, as per the report.

A special centre was designed in the US Embassy which monitored and recorded all the communications using listening devices  hidden in the jungle which was then “decrypted and translated by the National Security Agency,” the report states. US officials also assisted the Columbian government to build up special units training centre followed by intelligence gathering and informant programs.

The “War on Terror” categories these operations as clandestine. The report further states that “CIA also trained Colombian interrogators to more effectively question thousands of FARC deserters, without the use of the ‘enhanced interrogation’ techniques approved for use on al-Qaeda and later repudiated by Congress as abusive”.

“Meanwhile, the other secret U.S. agency that had been at the forefront of locating and killing al-Qaeda arrived on the scene,” the report also states. “Elite commandos from JSOC began periodic annual training sessions and small-unit reconnaissance missions to try to find the hostages.”

William Wood, who served as U.S. ambassador to Colombia from 2003 to 2007, before assigning to Afghanistan, in an interview to Washington post said, “There is no country, including Afghanistan, where we had more going on.”

Rate this Article
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
The views expressed are of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of the Indian Defence Review.

About the Author

Anant Mishra

is a security analyst with expertise in counter-insurgency and counter-terror operations. His policy analysis has featured in national and international journals and conferences on security affairs.

More by the same author

Post your Comment

2000characters left