Why Afghan Forces Melted So Quickly?
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
Issue Net Edition | Date : 18 Aug , 2021

The Taliban now control almost the whole of Afghanistan including the capital city, Kabul, almost two decades since they were driven out by US troops. It was widely expected that after the United States complete withdrawal the Taliban will make significant territorial gains. But no one expected that it will happen at that fast pace and 300,000 plus Afghan forces will melt so quickly in front of advancing Taliban forces. Taliban followed a well-calibrated military strategy. They started offensive with seizing large tracts of rural territory and then capturing key border crossings, at last, started to besiege provincial capitals. But in this process, the Taliban didn’t encounter any stiff resistance from the Afghan government forces. The Taliban is much stronger now than at any point since it was ousted in 2001. Currently, Taliban forces number up to eighty-five thousand full-time fighters. But a valid question arises as to why numerically superior and more resourceful Afghan forces were not able to hold the Taliban. At many places, Afghan army commanders contacted the Taliban and negotiated a safe passage for them, and handed over their equipment and armaments to the Taliban. The US has spent around $88 billion on Afghan security forces since 2001 but still they turned out to be a huge disappointment. This astonishing military victory of the Taliban is more because of the weakness of Afghan forces rather than its own strengths. Let’s have a look at some factors responsible for this outcome.

Highly Demoralized Afghan military that over the past two decades was heavily dependent on U.S. support for airpower, intelligence, logistics, planning, and other vital enablers was fatally demoralized by the U.S. decision to abandon it. In recent months, the Afghan military was finding it very hard to provide vital supplies such as food and ammunition to outposts scattered around the country. Some Afghan units, particularly the elite special forces commandos, fought hard nearly to the end. But getting ominous indication, most troops chose to cut deals with the Taliban, surrender, or simply melt away rather than risk their lives for a hopeless cause.

Corruption Some of the analysts blame the impotence among the military apparatus on the established corruption in the institution. Public opinion and observers recognize the army as a deeply corrupt and inept organization, even lacking to provide enough food, ammunition, and proper clothing to its servicemen. Such ineptitude is said to be the main reason emboldening the Taliban to make advances against the government forces across the country and carry out fatal assaults against them and the public.

Sectarian composition of Armed Forces The Tajiks occupy more top posts in comparison to their population against other ethnic groups. For example, the presence of the Hazaras and other ethnic groups are smaller in size compared to their population. Pashtuns are also included but a large number of Pashtun personnel are from the eastern areas of the country. Only a small number of the southern Pashtuns who make up an ideological and ethnic base of Taliban are included in the armed forces. Such an imbalance created mistrust and misunderstanding among different sectarian groups towards the army, making it look like a foreign force.

No clear military Strategy The country’s security apparatus as a complex lacked security and strategic analysts to lay the foundation of a combat policy ahead of the Afghan policymakers. To press forward against the militants using a well-studied defense program. Rather than just focusing on responding to insurgent’s attack, Afghan military strategists could have chalk out a proactive strategy that engages the enemy in their stronghold.

Weak Intelligence Afghan forces required a robust intelligence collection and targeting capability to counter reinvigorated Taliban insurgency. Afghanistan intelligence agency i.e. National Directorate of Security (NDS) not only suffered from an inability to share and disseminate actionable intelligence. But also is plagued by the controversy of favoritism and nepotism and its ethnic composition dominated by Panjshiris Tajiks from Panjshir a group affiliated with the former Northern Alliance. The NDS ethnic composition posed challenges to the intelligence agency’s ability to infiltrate the Pashtun groups most likely affiliated with the continued insurgency in Afghanistan.  Also, no attention was paid to increase more advanced voice intercept capabilities and cross-communication between the National Directorate of Security (NDS) and security forces in the field.

Even the fate of the previous Afghan army under former President Mohammed Najibullah was better than the current one. Najibullah’s forces disintegrated due to deep ethnic and factional divisions, the absence of good leadership, and declining financial and technical support from the Soviet Union. But that downfall of forces took years but the current disaster even didn’t take months to happen. For sure it was the U.S. pullout that brutally exposed the shortcomings of the Afghan forces and precipitated the military’s collapse. But also timely corrective steps were not taken by the Afghan military leadership hence government forces met with such a disgraceful end.

Rate this Article
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
The views expressed are of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of the Indian Defence Review.

About the Author

Manish Rai

A columnist for Middle-East and Af-Pak region and Editor of geo-political news agency Views Around.

More by the same author

Post your Comment

2000characters left

3 thoughts on “Why Afghan Forces Melted So Quickly?

  1. these developments look eerily deja’vu-ish

    The last three times any army waltzed into Kabul , things were quiet for a while , then the real hostilities began

    1. the very first march to Kabul in the Spring of 1839 under John Keane. The British met no real resistance. They actually played cricket in Kabul. Then the uprising took place which destroyed that party.
    2. The Soviets , who just drove into Kabul with virtually no real resistance. Results are known
    3. and now the “Taliban” , who have no idea of 21st century government.

    The big question is the 300,000 strong, better trained Afghan “Army”. where did it go?
    my non-expert view is that its still there , hiding in plain site.

    In the next few months, the “Taliban” brutality , incompetence, anti-modernism etc will provoke these same former afghan army into a counter offensive.

    The Taliban has no government. they have limited weapons and numbers.

    The gameplan should be obvious:

    -India should immediately facilitate an alliance between Ahmed Shah Masood’s Son and Amrullah Saleh… if its not being done already.

    -lobby/goad/cajole the NATO to cutoff weapons and funding for the “Taliban”, majority of whom seem to be misguided villagers/tribesmen. buy out the non-committed into dispersing… do whatever but break up the mid-levels.

    -Some heavy backdoor Carrot and stick with Pak to cutoff all funding/weapons to Taliban. US can help here (They have a score to settle with ISI)

    -Use whatever clout with OIC and Iran, to recognise Saleh as the true Afghan govt. representative. Use whatever clout left with Moscow.

    if no action taken, the chaos of Taliban misrule will still play out, but India will remain on the sidelines.

  2. ‘But a valid question arises as to why numerically superior and more resourceful Afghan forces were not able to hold the Taliban.’

    A major part of the answer lies in the reshuffles of Afghan commanders earlier this year. This all leads to the suspicion that the Taliban takeover was planned all along – the aim being to have the Sunni jihadis armed to the teeth with American weapons, so as to create a problem for Iran on its eastern border.

  3. Afghan leadership threw in the towel as soon as Biden ordered a withdrawal. Forces on the ground were abandoned without rations and ammunition. As in the case of India and the US, it is the leadership that sold the soldiers down the river.

More Comments Loader Loading Comments