Response to Chinese Assertiveness: Hoodwinked, Deluded or Eyes Wide Shut
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
Issue Net Edition | Date : 14 Mar , 2021

Oddly enough it requires just two phrases to cogently describe our attempts to keep our military strong and defend our territorial integrity over the past seventy-four years. The first, by French writer and journalist Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr, who wrote plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose” which translates into “the more things change the more they remain the same.” The second, more pertinent to our current situation, lines made famous by the English Poet Alexander Pope, suggesting that invariablyfools rush in where angels fear to tread”.

In his latest address at the Combined Commanders Conference Prime Minister Modi stressed the importance of enhancing indigenisation in the national security system, not just in sourcing weapons and equipment but also in the doctrines, procedures and customs practiced in the Armed Forces. We had already been given a preview of his outlandishideas with classical music being played at the Republic Day Parade and the incorporation of Police Bands into the Military Tattoo that Beating the Retreat symbolises.

The gloves are now off as he has forcefully reinforcedhis earlier message by upending the once sacrosanct military chain of command and directing that a sprinkling of junior officers and men also participate in deliberations that purportedly take a macro-level look at issues pertaining to national security. Something that is akin to inviting the average citizen to sit in and participate in deliberations of the Union Cabinet. While at this time these moves may have been merely symbolic, his intentions are crystal clear as to the kind of military he wishes to see.

We know this because this is a road that we have gone down before, a path his bête noire, Pandit Nehru, trod in the late 1950’s, one might add with rather distressing results. In the Official History of the 1962 Conflict with China, the Chief Editor, Dr S N Prasad, concludes that the chief reason for our defeat was that the political establishment was unable to avoid a war while it was in the process of transforming the military establishment. In his view Mr. Nehru and Mr. Krishna Menon perceived the military as a “close- knit professional body, deliberately isolated from the citizen. Its predominant motive force remained espirit de corps and not identification with the people. Someday it may even act like the Praetorian Guard of the Roman Empire. The Indian Army trained and fought like the British Army, unimaginative, elephantine, rule-bound and road bound…. Perhaps he wanted to model it after the People’s Liberation Army of China, more egalitarian, flexible, closer to the people.

He then goes on to suggest Such basic changes required a committed, or at least a pliant, band of army officers in key positions. So mediocre Thapar was selected instead of the doughty Thorat as Army Chief, and Bijji Kaul was made CGS……. To carry out this transformation of the national defence set up, a decade of peace was absolutely essential. For establishing indigenous weapons manufacture, money had to be found by cutting arms imports. The armed forces would be short of equipment and stores for several years till the new arms factories started producing. The officer cadre was a house divided within itself, till the new breed fully took over. A period of transition was inevitable, during which the fighting machine would not be fully efficient and would be vulnerable………Therein seems to lie the basic cause of the debacle of 1962. India failed to avoid a war during the transition period. Lulled by faulty political assessment and wrong intelligence forecasts, the country got caught in a war when it was least prepared.”

Not only are his views in the context of Eastern Ladakh and the situation we find ourselves in today remarkablyprescient, but it also once again reminds us that history has a rather awkward way of repeating itself, especially for those who refuse to learn from the past. We not only have a military that is battered, bruised and underfunded, thanks to prolonged neglect by the political class, which now faces the added burden of being tampered with to ensure that it is led by pliant and politically committed officers. If Mr. Modi succeeds, he would have delivered the coup de grace to the apolitical and secular foundations that have been the hallmark of our military since Independence. The very reason for which it has been held in such high esteem over all these years as other institutions crumpled.

Fortunately, all has not been lost yet thanks to President Xi’s use of Chairman Mao’s playbook to show us up in poor light and bring us down a peg or two. The fact that China continues to occupy a 1000 sq. kms of our territory and now seems reluctant to back down leads one to conclude that this territory is as good as lost, much in the same manner that Nehru lost us territory earlier. The difference being that once his prevarications were seen through Nehru attempted to take the battle to the Chinese, unfortunately with disastrous consequences mentioned earlier.

Mr. Modi, on the other hand, refuses to admit that we have conceded territory, despite evidence in public domain to the contrary from a host of intelligence sources, both human and technical. In fact, there has been a concerted effort bymedia channels, eminent analysts as well as those within this government and in the military to convince the public into believing that we have given back in equal measure and stalled Chinese adventurism, at least for the time being. There is no denying that we dented the PLA’s reputation and image following the Galwan Clash and by our pre-emptive occupation of the Kailash Ranges.

However, the manner in which we meekly surrendered our advantage of holding the dominating heights and withdrew from the Kailash Heights in the hopes of achieving a return to the status quo ante of last April made plain that we lacked the stomach for a fight. Clearly the need for a quiet border so that Mr. Modi could concentrate on winning the forthcoming State Elections mattered more than the loss of a 1000 sq. kms of barren land.

There are already indications that the Chinese have no intention of vacating occupied areas and are only going to get more assertive in the coming months, not just in Eastern Ladakh but opposite Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh as well. Once this becomes clear then attempts will be made to corner Mr. Modi over this debacle. However, it will be the Army leadership that will pay the price for its sycophancy. It will be blamed for having been gullible enough to take the Chinese at their word and ending up hoodwinked instead. The sad truth that this Government deluded itself and walked into a trapwith eyes wide shut will be conveniently forgotten. One can only hope that present efforts to indigenise the military too will meet the same fate.

Rate this Article
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
The views expressed are of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of the Indian Defence Review.

About the Author

Brig Deepak Sinha

is a Military Veteran and was formerly with the ORF, and now is member of The Peninsula Foundation, a Chennai based Think-Tank.

More by the same author

Post your Comment

2000characters left

5 thoughts on “Response to Chinese Assertiveness: Hoodwinked, Deluded or Eyes Wide Shut

  1. Very well written although in a subdued tone. The bottom line is: “we lacked the stomach for a fight”, which puts succinctly the total bankruptcy of India’s statecraft. This “disengagement” with abandoning Kailash by the Army reminds of the observation made by the US General Maxwell Taylor visiting Delhi to take stock in the aftermath of the 1962 debacle that the Himalayas protected India with impregnable defenses since time immemorial, but the Indian State was oblivious to that in 1962. It is now history repeating itself in Ladakh. There is no point in just blaming the political masters Modi & Co holding power in Delhi, but the military is equally culprit in this unfurling of events. It just bares open Hindu cowardice on the international stage, and that the military has made India an easy game for the Chinese.

  2. Highly disgusting ,unprofessional and politicised thoughts by the veteran .When India shown world the way to defeat fake chinese communists ,this writer is spreading propaganda .Shameful!

  3. Recent address of military commanders has been a welcome departure from past with attendance of rank & file. In the first case, the meeting was not in Delhi. Why should all meetings, symposia or events be only held in Delhi? PM has highlighted important issues during his address and commanders must apply their mind to reform and improve. No harm a PM to be unconventional rather then follow beaten path.

  4. Well analyzed, plain speaking by author. Its neither deluded nor eyes wide shut, but a pragmatic approach to negotiate peace with a super economic/ military power. Might is right, and so Hobson’s choice for India. We have reconciled to this loss of 1000 sq km, which no way, can be retrieved, . Since, Chinese perception of LAC has been accepted, one can just be optimistic that peace shall prevail and Indians can look forward to Achhe Din at border.

  5. While the apprehensions based on our historical records are understandable, I think it is unrealistic to assume that the army is only a silent spectator … why not trust our army and it’s hierarchy to do what is appropriate and grant them better understanding of the situation and the courage to stand by what they think is right rather than take tactical and operational decisions based on the gut feelings of veterans detached in time and space and are also without any ( or adequate) ground inputs….

More Comments Loader Loading Comments