Needed, a new military doctrine to deter Pakistan permanently
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
Issue Net Edition | Date : 30 Oct , 2014

Before the ceasefire agreement was signed in 2003 between India and Pakistan, ceasefire violations were a regular feature all along the Line of Control. During these engagements, heavy artillery fire was exchanged very frequently. Such artillery and mortar duels generally caused larger casualties among the civilians compared to the armed forces, as civilians had no overhead protection. Pakistan resorted to cross-border firing in the recent past mainly to facilitate the infiltration of militants into Jammu and Kashmir.

The violation across the international border besides the LoC was aimed to enlarge the conflict to force India to open talks.

The numerous ceasefire violations started by Pakistan in the first half of this month along the international border were of a different genre, fire was now far more intense and heavy weapons were used to target civilian areas. The reasons for this sudden and ferocious assault were not far to seek: having failed to receive any response from the international community of Nawaz Sharif’s appeal at the UNGA last month for reviving the old UN Resolutions regarding holding a plebiscite in Kashmir, Pakistan opened a new front to attract attention of the international community. The violation across the international border besides the LoC was aimed to enlarge the conflict to force India to open talks. Unfortunately for Pakistan, both these attempts failed. Whether it helped infiltration attempts in some sectors, is not known. After this major ceasefire violation and targeting of civilian areas the old ceasefire agreement is all but dead, and in future, sporadic ceasefire violations of various intensities should be expected.

Pakistan does and will continue to blame India for ceasefire violations and also claim to have suffered heavy civilian casualties from what they term as “unprovoked” firing by India. The mechanism of flag meetings between field commanders and activating of the hotline between the two Directors-General of Military Operations for holding fire, failed in this instance. It is obvious that to deter Pakistan from continuing with future ceasefire violations, India will have to take some other measures as no fool-proof method has been found to deter Pakistan from opening fire across the LoC or the international border at will.

In this kind of static, linear and limited engagements, the weaker side has the advantage, as superior force cannot be brought to bear on the enemy without crossing the LoC. Crossing the LoC, which is now an internationally-recognised border in J&K, will immediately ring alarm bells and draw unwarranted international attention to the Kashmir problem. All factors considered, crossing the LoC or waging a limited war will not solve the problem, for it would upset the present status of the Line of Control so assiduously drawn as a permanent border after the 1971 war.

It will be necessary to isolate and destroy Pakistani forward posts and forward logistic support bases fully.

Any intensification of the firefight across the LoC will not deter Pakistan from resorting to border firing in the future. This means India will have to adopt new weapons and methods to fight a static war that would gravely hurt Pakistan. India will require new techniques, tactics, weapons systems and technology that will cause unbearably heavy casualties on Pakistani forces deployed on the LoC/border. The new techniques and weapon systems should be such that they would penetrate the enemy’s concrete overhead shelters over their bunkers and communication trenches to expose Pakistani troops to lethal firing.

The new weapon systems should be able to cause very heavy casualties, cut off lines of retreat and destroy logistic support bases in the immediate vicinity of the offending Pakistani posts, also jam their rear and forward communication systems. It will be necessary to isolate and destroy Pakistani forward posts and forward logistic support bases fully. In the past, when concrete bunkers were not available in forward areas, to either side, many posts had to be abandoned when their overhead cover was blown open by artillery fire, exposing men and material to highly lethal fire. Some of these posts are still there and are called barbad posts.

A disturbing feature of the border/LoC war is the extensive loss of life and property of civilians living in border areas. Their life is in danger during all border incidents. Moreover their normal life is disrupted for long periods. They are unable to work in their fields or harvest their crops. Their communication and food supplies are cut off. During the current spell of cross-border firing, the death toll in India rose to 12 and the number of injured could be counted in hundreds. Thousands had to leave the areas straddling the LoC and the international border.

…this time our army meted out very heavy punishment, it was not sufficient to stop sporadic ceasefire violations by the Pakistan army.

As Indian and Pakistani troops continued their prolonged exchange of fire, Pakistan deliberately targeted dozens of villages, killing and injuring a large number of women and children. In such an environment, it is obvious that the doctrine for dealing with cross-border firefights must include plans for evacuating the affected civilian population out of the war zone in an orderly and well-organised manner. It is perhaps necessary to build and maintain concrete shelters in the vicinity of the affected villages, where villagers can find immediate shelter from enemy fire without running away from their villages. The armed forces must take the responsibility of providing medical aid in situ and evacuating casualties to civilian hospitals in the rear areas.

It seems at present that our army does not have a separate doctrine for this kind of static engagements with Pakistan forces. Although, this time our army meted out very heavy punishment, it was not sufficient to stop sporadic ceasefire violations by the Pakistan army.

Incidentally, unconfirmed reports say: a) Pakistan lost around 165 people, which included 85 military personnel. b) Approximately, 80-90 Pakistani posts were either fully destroyed or rendered operationally ineffective. c) About 400-450 jihadis waiting to cross over were forced to fall back to their staging areas.

Regardless of this information being right or wrong, reports are coming that Pakistan has recommenced sporadic cross-border firing; it is therefore obvious that a better well formulated plan is required to deter Pakistan permanently.


Rate this Article
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
The views expressed are of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of the Indian Defence Review.

About the Author

Maj Gen Afsir Karim

is Editor Aakrosh and former Editor Indian Defence Review.

More by the same author

Post your Comment

2000characters left

6 thoughts on “Needed, a new military doctrine to deter Pakistan permanently

  1. Beware of online spell or to fix your broken marriage or relationship problem or after a divorce or Breakup,I was recently scam by two of them, until one faithful day i meet a man called Dr Oseiboh who help me to get back to the mother of my 2 kids after we have been separated for 3 years,I only pay for the items required for the spell and he cast the spell for me within 48hours my ex wife called me and beg me to forgive her for everything and we are back together.if you need a real and quick love spell or you are passing through pregnancy problem Dr Oseiboh is the answer, Please if any body needs. LOVE SPELL,LOTTERY,PREGNANCY SPELL, DIVORCE SPELL,STOP COUNT CASE,DEATH SPELL,BUSINESS SPELL AND MANY MORE YOU MAKE NEED. Email him now for your own help. via email add him on whatsapp line or call +2347017565415.

  2. Hello, i am Johnson Pamela from TX, USA. Life without my husband was a real mess for me and my children. I am so happy to get my Ex back through the help of Dr Amend who cast a spell, that brought my ex back to me. My greatest surprise was that 48 hours after the Doctor prepared the spell for me, my husband who has abandoned me just to be with another lady, after 7 years of our marriage, my husband suddenly developed a sudden hate for me just because he found another new love, this woman came to matter and destroy our relationship between me and my husband and my life became miserable, and i thought there was no hope for me, every thing became meaningless to me, because the one i 7 so much has abandoned me for another woman. i was becoming increasingly despondent and i thought that was the end of life. it was not until i saw a post on the internet one faithful day about Dr Amend how he cast death and love spells, i decided to contact him to see if can truly help me, he did it perfectly by casting a dead spell on this woman who try to take my husband away from me, and also cast a love spell on my husband, immediately after 48 hours my husband came apologizing that he was sorry for every thing that he did to me, that he never new what came over him, that was how my family came to be united again. A big thanks to Dr Amend the spell caster, for making me a happy woman today. contact him if you need his assistant because i know he can also help you. contact him through his email: or add him up on whatsapp +2348118829919…

  3. Thank you Maj Karim for starting a discussion on the new doctrine to deter Pakistan’s terrorism war on India. The policy changes necessary to push back the Pakistani military sponsored violence on the border are long overdue. There is however, a backdrop under which Pakistani military is operating, intentionally, knowingly and determinedly in support of terrorism war against India. This backdrop is a threat of starting a nuclear war should India retaliate forcefully. India’s new doctrine must face such a threat squarely. There is no validity in talking of mutual destruction scenarios to scare Pakistan. Today this nation has degenerated into a mindset of a suicide bomber. India must learn from the super powers who over the last sixty years have had a nuclear détente. The underpinning was their full faith in retaliation capability. Each side new exactly how many bombers, submarines and missiles were pointed at each other and the invincibility to deliver total destruction on the side starting the nuclear war. India must prove to Pakistan that it is fully capable of doing that. A good expression of this doctrine would be a fleet of Indian nuclear armed stealth submarines patrolling off the coast of Karachi with missiles pointed at Karachi, Lahore and Islamabad. India must declare openly in clear terms that it will consider any use of nuclear weapon from Pakistan against India as the first strike inviting instant and large scale retaliation with nuclear weapons. There will be no option for negotiation or UN emergency meetings. This is the only way to neutralize Pakistan’s nuclear threat and give India space to operate against terrorists camps in Pakistan with conventional measures.

  4. I think India has to define a clear offensive strategy. Clearly accepting status-quo or addressing tit-for-tat border events is not a solution. We have an Israel like situation where infiltration, tunnels and explicit terrorism is rampant from Pakistan and continues to be part of their explicitly stated strategy. It is very clear that the only thing they understand is strength and will power to execute with a stick.
    The US and international withdrawal from Afghanistan increases the issue many fold. There are many fronts of enhancements one has to think through carefully, although each have its negative effects
    (1) Vastly improve covert action strategies
    (2) Enhance technology to record indisputable evidence (with satellite camera’s etc) of their mischief in any international court, UN or other forums. (Remember the Cuban incident of Russia and the evidence presented by US in UN was powerful enough for Russia to back down)
    (3) Employ/Deploy offensive forces and technology such as drone’s.
    (4) Vastly improve direct force deployment in Afghanistan for its defense, as well as, develop military annex facility in case of need.
    Jai Hind

  5. Excellent article Sir. We also need to accurately locate and hit their gun and mortar positions. Additionally, we are sitting right on top of them on the Saltoro Range. If they can violate the IB Sector then we can really hurt them in Siachen.

More Comments Loader Loading Comments