IDR Blog

India’s Foreign Policy Challenges in the Middle East 2016
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
Dr Subhash Kapila | Date:19 Apr , 2016 1 Comment
Dr Subhash Kapila
is a graduate of Royal British Army Staff College Camberley and combines a rich & varied professional experience in Indian Army (Brigadier), Cabinet Secretariat and diplomatic/official assignments in USA, UK, Japan, South Korea, and Bhutan.

India in 2016 is faced with serious foreign policy predicaments in its Middle East foreign policy formulations in terms of coherent strategic choices cutting through the complicated maze of regional power rivalries and a return of Great Power interventions casting complicated shadows on regional power-play.

The Middle East today is witnessing both a direct strategic and military tussle between Iran, Saudi Arabia and Turkey as the regional powers in the Middle East and also proxy wars unleashed by them in the pursuance of their respective agendas for regional power predominance.

Ironically, the United States and Russia are no longer controlling powers of the Middle East region as during the Cold War days. In 2016 both the United States and Russia can be said to be virtually reduced to external actors with powerful intervention capabilities as witnessed recently in the ongoing Syrian crisis.

In terms of alignments of regional powers with external actors, the picture obtaining in 2016 is of Saudi Arabia and Turkey down- sliding into frayed and questionable ties with their erstwhile strategic patron i.e. the United States. Russia on the other hand continues with its strong security ties with Iran and Syria.

Iran in 2016, after belated recognition by the United States that it can no longer side-line Iran in the American strategic calculus and reaching recent accords, Iran has thrust itself as the naturally predominant Middle East regional power, much to the irritation and annoyance of Saudi Arabia and Turkey. In fact both Saudi Arabia and Turkey have been involved for the last couple of years in a proxy battle for regime change of the strongly pro-Iran Assad regime in Damascus, to limit Iran’s powerful strategic profile.

China as a major power has balanced its ties in the Middle East by synchronising a perceptibly equitable distribution of its strategic attention between Saudi Arabia and Iran. China’s distance from Turkey has perceptibly increased for some months from what emerged earlier as a robust strategic partnership.

India’s foreign policy challenges in the Middle East in 2016 need to be contextually viewed in the matrix of the above regional power-play and the interests of the United States and Russia.

A word or two of the demonstrated diplomatic and political record in terms of preferences of Iran, Saudi Arabia and Turkey in the Indian Subcontinent will be in order for analytical purposes. Both Saudi Arabia and Turkey have in the past and even in 2016 continue to be slanted towards Pakistan in the Indian Subcontinent. Both Saudi Arabia and Turkey have strong traditional linkages with the Pakistan Army and which component shapes their foreign policies.

Significantly, Saudi Arabia has pumped in millions of dollars into Pakistan’s nuclear weapons programmes as per media reports of the last decade. Pakistan has not only committed itself to provide nuclear weapons technology to Saudi Arabia but as per some reports committed itself to provide a ‘nuclear umbrella to Saudi Arabia if required.

Iran notably from the last stages of the Shah Regime and upto 2016 can be said to have been more circumspect in its dealings with Pakistan. In fact Iran which enjoys a Strategic Partnership of some substance with India has respected India’s strategic sensitivities.  Iran has creditably facilitated India’s transport linkages with Afghanistan via the Chah Bahar Port and onward transportation linkages for India into Afghanistan.

Complicating the Indian foreign policy challenges in the Middle East is Pakistan’s insidious propaganda against India’s increase in diplomatic interaction with the region is that India is a doubtful entity when it comes to providing security guarantees for the region.

India’s foreign policy challenges in the Middle East in 2016 need to be viewed on two different planes, namely, the diplomatic plane and the more significant politico-strategic plane.  On the diplomatic plane one has no quibbles in terms of Indian foreign policy initiatives for enlargement of the scope and intensity of diplomatic engagements with all the countries in the Middle East, big or small.

These two planes need to be borne in mind as Prime Minister Modi prepares for his forthcoming visit to Saudi Arabia. Some in Indian policy establishment would advocate stronger ties with Saudi Arabia over Iran going solely by trade figures. But then it has to be remembered that Indian trade figures with Iran suffered due to US sanctions. Has Saudi Arabia as Pakistan’s most ardent and powerful patron ever used its influence to moderate Pakistan’s brinkmanship with India?

On the strategic and politico-strategic plane of India’s foreign policy towards the Middle East powers in 2016, a lot needs to be said.

India’s foreign policy in the Middle East in 2016 must reflect India’s strategic preferences in terms of India’s national security interests based on the past demonstrated record of Iran, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, the respect that these three countries have accorded to India’s strategic sensitivities and lastly any current indicators available in 2016 which could prompt India to revise the order of its strategic preferences.

In a dispassionate analysis of all the three criteria stated above Iran clearly emerges on all counts as the “Strategic Most Favoured Nation” in the strategic calculus of India’s foreign policy challenges in 2016.Both Iran and India have strong strategic convergences in the past and if the Indian foreign policy establishment imaginatively manages the Iran-India Strategic Partnership, India could be said to be on the right side of history as far as its embedment in the Middle East is concerned.

Concluding, one can rightfully observe that a robust and vibrant Iran-India Strategic Partnership, in effect, would emerge as a powerful game-changer not only in the stability of the Middle East but also for the stability of the Greater South West Asia.


Rate this Article
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
The views expressed are of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of the Indian Defence Review.

Post your Comment

2000characters left

One thought on “India’s Foreign Policy Challenges in the Middle East 2016

  1. There are too many hyphenations. There is the US-NATO-Sunni Axis. There is the US-Israel Axis. There is the US-Turkey Axis cemented by NATO. T here is the US-CIA-Daesh Axis. There is the US-Pentagon Taliban Axis. There is the US- Pakistan-Taliban Axis, There is the US-CIA-Pentagon Axis. There is the US-State-Department-Islam Axis. There is now a new US-Iran detente. There is the Sunni agglomeration with the Sunni-Arab sub text. There is the US-Saudi-Qatar Axis. There is the US Petro-Dollar Axis. There is the Sunni-Pakistan Axis. There is the China-Pakistan Axis. There is the US-Pakistan Axis. There is an emerging Russia-China Axis brought on by US machinations in Europe that further strengthen Pakistan and weaken India. There is the Russia Syria Axis. And there is an India where Foreign “Policy” (assuming that there is one) is emerged by owners of Adarsh flats, dodging Preet Barrara, as they seek to “Quit India” , on the foundation of a weakness and vulnerability that would be shocking in the context of Indian potential if it were not by deliberate and Constitutional design.. A design that pampers, foments, fosters and promotes the incompetence and unaccountability of owners of Adarsh Apartments and other VVIPs. of Ambedkarist birth,r Nehruvian nepotism or Constitutional Kleptocracy membership..

    It was Pakistan that brokered the entente cordiale between China and the US and it was the US that facilitated Pakistan to become a Nuclear power through South Africa. Pakistan (A.Q.Khan) procured its enrichment centrifuges from the same Dutch Source as US Ally Apartheid South Africa did and helped fashion both it own and Israel’s clandestine bombs. Saudi Arabia financed the entire caper. This has its roots in the US-NATO-Sunni Axis that was forged by Nixon, Kissinger and Sheikh Yamani. China later helped Pakistan (and North Korea) with missiles and Tactical (battle field) nuclear weapons.

More Comments Loader Loading Comments