Geopolitics

Trump-Kim Summit II – Is Resolution Really Possible?
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
Issue Net Edition | Date : 15 Feb , 2019

While South Korea has every reason to be hopeful about the upcoming summit of President Trump with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un in Hanoi scheduled for February 27 and 28th this year, looking for a peaceful nuclear free Korean Peninsula, but with inadequate signs of North Korean activities towards denuclearization and all US sanctions in place, the global pulse is that it seems to be impractical.

Despite doing all the hard work for getting them together at Singapore, South Korea would have realized that nothing worthwhile progressed beyond optics of a successful break through.

In the meantime South Korea had to do a remarkable balancing act of improving the relations with North Korea displaying Korean Sentiments with one flag participation in Winter Olympics and commencing rail and road links on one hand  and signing the revised Special Measures Agreement (SMA) with US. It stipulates a cost-sharing for the U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) resulting South Korea paying 1.04 trillion won (925 million U.S. dollars) this year (An increase of 8.2 percent over last year for 28,500 US Troops stationed there along with equipment.

Optics of coming closer but Varying Expectations

President Trump in a speech earlier this month had announced the Summit with hopes of compliance of Singapore understanding by North Korea. US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo had earlier reiterated that sanctions will remain until Pyongyang carries out the complete verifiable denuclearization commitments made in Singapore.

US is unlikely to settle down peacefully unless the threat to its mainland is eliminated. President Trump is also carrying a baggage of promise to do something, which his predecessors could not do with North Korea; hence with full awareness of reality he may not pitch high hopes, but will have face saving negotiations ready with good optics, if he fails to achieve something better.

North Korea on the other hand had been pursuing a “byungjin” policy of simultaneously developing its nuclear capabilities alongside the economy. With seemingly impractical promises made by North Korea in Singapore to get immediate relief from tough US sanctions, it stands disappointed as it’s smart move did not work.

In November 2018 it warned US that it will “seriously” consider returning to its erstwhile state policy of building nuclear weapons, if US does not end tough economic sanctions against it. North Korea is unlikely to take a gamble to give away its only strategic leverage, after witnessing the fate of Iraq, Libya and recently Iran.  

Kim is unlikely to strip himself of the power which made US President talk to him twice. His acts can be seen as nuclear blackmail by global community, but it is a feather in the cap of Kim which makes him taller in domestic as well as global arena. UN reports also indicate that no worthwhile denuclearization has happened in North Korea.

Expectations of Other Key Players

South Korea will be genuinely looking for peace, as Seoul is within reach of conventional weapons of North Korea. Besides nuclear free Korean Peninsula it suits South Korea to have an economically prosperous North Korea. Its gesture to re-commence rail and road transportation between North and South Korea justifies the desire for better relations.

China may not necessarily be too happy with Korean bonhomie and if US obliges (Although chances are remote) a US aligned peaceful Korean Peninsula. China will never like the buffer between its mainland and US Forces in South Korea to go away and Kim to be stripped of all nukes. On the other hand, it will also not like to invite THAAD too close to its borders, more so with ongoing trade war with US and relative strategic unease in context of South China Sea and Taiwan. China however made a smart move by unilaterally commencing logistics support and trade with North Korea.

Japan will continue to be skeptical of North Korea with the threat it poses to it, will continue to feel insecure with unresolved East China Sea disputes and wavering stance of US; hence may be seen to be doing some balancing acts despite remaining an ally of US.

The Russian concerns will be no different than Chinese regarding the development of THAAD. For any lasting solution China, Japan and Russia will have to be taken on board as the issue has crossed the limit of being a bilateral issue.

Will the Summit Succeed?

In diplomatic circles, no summit ever fails because minimum it can achieve is develop better understanding and plan for further negotiations. Having lost majority in Senate, President Trump will have to address the foreign policy issues to convince his voters for next Presidential elections that he tried his best.

US Defense Intelligence Agency report suggests that Iran and North Korea pose an increasing challenge to US in space as both countries have developed jamming capabilities, which can also add to the agenda of Summit.As a strategic analyst, I do not expect anything concrete coming out of the Summit which can amuse the affected parties or the global community, except diplomatic niceties to lower temperatures, but both parties will claim it to be a success.

The fact that President Trump is meeting Kim Jong-un again means that nuclear blackmailing works and it makes sense for any country to be nuclear to ensure its safety. I will not be surprised if Iran, Japan and Saudi Arabia start thinking on these lines.

Indians will have to keep their antenna up regarding any possible missile proliferation to Pakistan, which is looking for such technology, after success of its Agni and Arihant programs of India. Expectations notwithstanding, it will be a summit which shows the priority of Trump Administration, and perhaps some signaling to China, by holding  it in Chinese backyard with one of its closest allies, without direct participation of South Korea, China, Japan and Russia. This is being done at a time, when the duration of truce in Trade War between US and China is shrinking. 

Rate this Article
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
The views expressed are of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of the Indian Defence Review.

About the Author

Maj Gen SB Asthana

Chief Instructor, United Service Institute of India.

More by the same author

Post your Comment

2000characters left

One thought on “Trump-Kim Summit II – Is Resolution Really Possible?

  1. Newspapers world-wide were abuzz on 19 January 2019 with reports of second meeting between US President Donald Trump and North Korea Chief leader Kim Jong Un towards end of February aimed at denuclearization deal in the Korean Peninsula. First such meeting was held on 12 June 2018 at Singapore. Now in early February 2019 , news reports are that Trump plans to meet North Korea’s Kim in Vietnam on 27 – 28 February 2019. Admittedly , attention of the whole world is centered on likely outcome of the second meeting. An answer to this can be read between the lines in this Vedic astrology writer’s predictive alerts of 1 October 2018 for the US through article – “ Astrological probable alerts for the US in 2019” – published on 1 November , 2018 in monthly Webzine of Wisdom Magazine at wisdom-magazine.com/Article.aspx/4897/. The sum and substance relevant is that the second meeting is coming up at a time on February 27 -28 when period suggested by this writer in the said article for waiting is practically over and the one that seemed to this writer to be opportune for the US seems to be beginning. In this light , a major breakthrough seems likely with some vital compliance or strategic tasks being scheduled for April -May in 2019. Let us look forward to something great in 2019.

More Comments Loader Loading Comments