Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 (CAA) and National Register of Citizens (NRC) has nothing in common but yet the propagandists are spreading rumours and creating scare nationwide leading to violence, loot and arson. It is a sad day for Indian democracy because the power of the Parliament is being challenged in the streets by misinformed crowds for the sake of petty political gains.
…violent protests leading to loot, arson and vandalising government and public property as well as attacking the police personnel thus creating a law and order problem amounts to nothing but deliberate assault on democratic ethos.
In a democracy, it is a well- established norm to carry out no holds barred discussion on the floors of both houses of Parliament before any bill becomes an act. The members are given opportunity to oppose, seek amendments or support the bill. Thereafter, the bill is passed by majority vote which could be ascertained verbally or through voting when the opposition presses for division. But once the bill is passed by the majority, it is the responsibility of all parties to respect the verdict of the parliament and facilitate its implementation after it becomes an Act after the Presidential consent.
Unfortunately, throwing to the winds the democratic norms, the opposition decided to take the fight to streets in respect of the recently passed Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). At times peaceful protests are alright to vent hurt sentiments or feelings but violent protests leading to loot, arson and vandalising government and public property as well as attacking the police personnel thus creating a law and order problem amounts to nothing but deliberate assault on democratic ethos.
Furthermore, if facts are suppressed and falsehood propagated along with rumours to create scare among vulnerable sections of the society, such acts deserve not only condemnation but thorough investigations to identify and punish the trouble-creators and their sympathisers.
Along with the Constitution of India, the Citizenship Act 1955, is the exhaustive law relating to citizenship in India. The original Act has been amended at various times by the Citizenship (Amendment) Acts of 1986, 1992, 2003, 2005, 2015 and 2019.
The 2003 amendment mandated the Government of India to construct a National Register of Citizens (NRC). The Citizenship Act of 1955 (promulgated by the Congress government) provides for compulsory registration of every citizen of India and issuance of National Identity Card to him. The Citizenship Rules of 2003 (promulgated by NDA government led by Atal Bihari Vajpayee) was framed to prescribe the manner of preparation of NRC to facilitate the implementation of the provisions of the Act of 1955.
CAA in no way prohibits or denies the right to apply for Indian citizenship to Muslims from these countries…
It needs to be understood that while the Citizenship Act or CAA are meant to grant Indian citizenship, the NRC is aimed at drawing a distinction between genuine registered Indian citizens and illegal immigrants who have entered the country through dubious means. NRC is nationality specific and not religion specific.
Indian Nationality law largely follows the ‘jussanguinis’ (citizenship by right of blood) as opposed to the ‘jus soli’ (citizenship by right of birth in the territory) practised in USA and many western countries.
The Indian citizenship is granted under four clauses namely; Citizenship by Birth, Citizenship by Descent, Citizenship by Registration and Citizenship by Naturalization. The 2019 CAA provides a path for the religiously persecuted minorities in the three Muslim majority neighbours of India who are also declared Islamic Republics who entered India on or before 31 December 2014. It relaxes the requirement of residence in India for Citizenship by Naturalisation from 11 years to 5 years for such refugees.
2019 CAA aims to draw a distinction between religiously persecuted refugees and illegal immigrants. It in no way prohibits or denies the right to apply for Indian citizenship to Muslims from these countries who will still have to follow the principle of naturalisation after 11 years.
Hence, there is nothing in the CAA for Muslims to fear.
…a misconception is being created by the vested interests for the sake of vote bank politics that CAA is the prelude to NRC.
However, a misconception is being created by the vested interests for the sake of vote bank politics that CAA is the prelude to NRC. This is nowhere near the truth and is a manufactured perception to provoke the Indian Muslims by creating a fear psychosis among them by using lose terminology like “India heading towards a Hindu Rashtra.” Such misconception and rumour-mongering has led to widespread violence and riots in the country creating unnecessary communal tension and is highly deplorable.
Home Ministry has repeatedly clarified, “CAA has nothing to do with NRC and it does not apply to Indian citizens, including Muslims. It applies to only six religious communities facing persecution in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan.”
No migrant will automatically become citizen of India as per the 2019 CAA, and each one will have to apply online, the refugees will have to fulfil all other conditions for registration, naturalisation as Indian citizen. Even Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad has clarified, “the amended Citizenship Act has nothing to do with the proposed nation-wide National Register of Citizens (NRC) exercise.
The Act does not take away the citizenship of an Indian national of any religion. When the draft of the proposed law on pan-India implementation of the NRC is prepared, it would be discussed and it will come before the people.
…in fact the protectors of Bangladeshi infiltrators and Rohingya supporters who are spreading the violent protests letting opportunities to sleeper cells of extremist & militant Islamic fundamentalist organisations – PFI, SIMI to resurface.
“There is no meaning in linking the NRC with the CAA,” he said responding to a question on fears that the amended citizenship law could be the prelude to the NRC exercise and minorities may get targeted.” The law minister also said, “Dialogue is the essence of democracy and those agitating against the amendments in the Act would be told that it does not hurt the interests of Indian citizens, including those from the minority communities.”
Hence the knowledge of Citizenship Act and purpose of NRC should satisfy the people and prevent them from falling prey to the mechanics of propagandists who are wanting to create a communal rift in the country. They are in fact the protectors of Bangladeshi infiltrators and Rohingya supporters who are spreading the violent protests letting opportunities to sleeper cells of extremist and militant Islamic fundamentalist organisations, Popular Front of India (PFI) and Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI)’ to resurface. These people have hijacked these issues and turned them into a communal issue for vote bank politics.