Military & Aerospace

Implications of a Mountain Strike Corps
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
Issue Vol. 29.1 Jan-Mar 2014 | Date : 11 Mar , 2014

Manifestation of the China Threat

Logically, China would prefer to ‘squeeze’ India through the ‘String of Pearls’ strategy; nibbling territory, psychological bullying, military posturing, economic blackmail and stoking up the internal fires of India. But, there is also this view of a cross-section in the West that China may not hesitate from using tactical nuclear weapon(s) to force India into territorial submission. However, what is certain is that should conflict happen, China will exploit all five domains of aerospace, land, sea, cyber and electro-magnetic. Sun Tzu had said, “The essence of warfare is creating ambiguity in the perceptions of the enemy.”

China has been making deep intrusions in Eastern Ladakh, nibbling into Indian territory that has totaled up to 400 sq.km.

To this end, China is likely to optimise her considerable cyber warfare capabilities not only to attack command and control networks but also cripple the country’s critical infrastructure. Using her continuous border surveillance cover, she is likely to make full use of PGMs and Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs), space-based assets and stealth platforms, both manned and unmanned and even psychotropic weapons, if developed by then. Her penchant for outflanking moves and manoeuvers as demonstrated in 1962 will, in all likelihood, be replaced through the third dimension, attacking and holding ground in depth.

Implications of a Mountain Strike Corps

In viewing the Mountain Strike Corps, the urgency of its raising needs to be viewed in the context that China is effectively hedged in the East by US Asia Pivot Policy and in the West by the countervailing interests of Eurasia despite her investments in the Central Asian Republics (CAR). What is most crucial to China is the ‘open’ South, which can also be her nemesis. Therefore, her increased belligerence and attempts to grab as much territory as possible to soft-pad her underbelly. That is the reason China wanted a new agreement – the BDCA that India foolishly agreed to including most devastatingly agreeing to not shadow intruding Chinese patrols.

But the fact is that dissident groups inside China can eschew overt political protest for covert sabotage, hacking, swarming and systems disruption while minority elements, particularly Muslims and cults such as Falun Gong will gravitate toward terrorism and criminal enterprises to fund their activities. The first car bomb in Beijing though crude and blast close to a CCP office in North China, are only pointers.

Chinese policy towards India has been no holds barred despite the façade…

An equally vital issue is that it would be naïve to view the Mountain Strike Corps in isolation as mere addition of 90,000 troops can hardly make a dent as mountains absorb manpower at unbelievable rates. While the Mountain Strike Corps would pose a ‘threat in being’, the real impact will be felt by China when a number of associated issues are addressed. The location of the Mountain Strike Corps formations should be such that it offers quick mobilisation but does not give away the intended thrust lines. Then is the vital issue of building border infrastructure, lack of which has actually encouraged Chinese intrusions. The BRO had been tasked in 2006 to construct 73 strategic roads that were to be completed by 2012 but only a fraction of this has been implemented. Unfortunately, the quality of BRO works has also deteriorated over the years and new roads constructed lose their surfacing in just one winter – more because of corruption than the vagaries of weather. Then is the total void of planning alternative routes. Roads reconnoitered by the Indian Army to bypass communication centres for faster mobilisation are not cleared for stupid reasons such as felling of trees.

Next is the requirement of surveillance. This cannot be restricted to border surveillance but must go in depth right up to the objectives of the Mountain Strike Corps but beyond to the area of interest including the areas from where enemy interference to the Corps thrust lines, as well as the flanks. This must be on 24×7 basis throughout the spectrum of conflict and must optimise Human Intelligence (HUMIMT) aside from all other forms of intelligence. India needs to optimise its satellite-based surveillance, UAVs and stealth drones. Command and control networks and weapon platforms would need to work in a cyber and electronic warfare-intensive setting.

The formation must have adequate potent firepower and punch; PGMs such as the Brahmos and DEWs. The artillery requirements need to be built up early, similar to positioning required armour for speedy thrusts where terrain permits. An effective air defence cover would be a vital need. While it is not known whether the inordinately delayed proposed procurement of 145 x M-777 ultra-light Howitzers from the US also cater for the Mountain Strike Corps. Knowing the system, it is unlikely this requirement would have been taken into account. It would, therefore, be prudent to work on this, in addition to speeding up indigenisation of the Bofors gun.

What is most crucial to China is the ‘open’ South, which can also be her nemesis…

The third dimension will come into play in a major way including for capture/establishment of air head(s) and subsequent follow-up of troop induction, with Special Forces inducted much before the outbreak of hostilities. Synergy between the Indian Army and the IAF would be of vital importance in Strike Corps operations. Not only will the IAF need to blast the enemy out, it would need to establish an EW corridor for successful airborne operations. The Army Special Forces and the Special Frontier Force battalions must train for simultaneous operations in Tibet including influencing the border area populations, as being done by China.

Concurrently, we must develop the capability to control the fault lines in China (which are many) by employing our Special Forces covertly in Xinjiang, Tibet and Gilgit-Baltistan in conjunction the Mountain Strike Corps. Special Forces provide us the tools to address non-traditional challenges by providing a silent and effective medium to achieve our security objectives. Special Forces are a vital element of national power possessing capability of enormous freedom of action in methodology of execution of assigned operations and should be fruitfully employed to meet any challenge. The key lies in achieving strategic objectives through the application of modest resources with the essential psychological component. This would not only tie up the PLA in knots, it would also be a befitting response to China’s nefarious designs on our territory.

On balance, the Mountain Strike Corps must have capacity (inbuilt and supported) for: information dominance and information assurance; ability to paralyse enemy C4I2 infrastructure; stand-off weapons to pre-empt enemy attack; adequate mix of DEWs and PGMs; ability to disrupt enemy logistics and sustenance including the Qinghai-Tibet rail line; mix of hard-kill and soft-kill options; layered air defence; improved ISR and communications systems, and fully networked forces.

Synergy between the Indian Army and the IAF would be of vital importance in Strike Corps operations…

At the national level, we need to push for across-the-board military integration at the operational and tactical levels and develop state-of-the-art technologies in spheres of space, cyber-space, stealth and smart technologies, improved nukes, lasers, intense lasers and plasma, nano-technology and robotics. In fact, we need to network all elements of national power.

Conclusion

China’s past history is laced with aggression and blatant disregard to world opinion. The PLA is well ahead of the Indian Army and this ever-widening gap, if not checked and bridged, will catapult Chinese adventurism. We should expect no respite from increasing Chinese pressure. China-Pakistan are hand in glove in waging asymmetric war against India and the situation is likely to get increasingly volatile inadvertently egged on by US-China and US-Pakistan equations and heightened Chinese aggressive posture. India needs to be prepared for a Chinese thrust into Arunachal Pradesh. We should have the capacity to thwart that and go for North Tibet employing not just the Mountain Strike Corps but all elements of national power.

1 2
Rate this Article
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
The views expressed are of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of the Indian Defence Review.

About the Author

More by the same author

Post your Comment

2000characters left

8 thoughts on “Implications of a Mountain Strike Corps

  1. The Chinese weakness lies in the Indian Ocean, ha ha lol you really think they will attack india by the sea, The Indian Army has the right idea let the other side know you can strike back “ mountain strike corps is not the only option, they need one for the Pakistani border.

  2. The 17 mountain strike corps must be fascinating contemplation for many military enthusiasts around the world. I thought that the corps would be mostly comprised of mountaineer soldiers and used for defensive-offensive operations on the border. I gather that the strike corps are to have 60,000 soldiers and I don’t exactly know how many soldiers will man the two mountain divisions of the strike corps. China doesn’t need mountain divisions for defensive purposes in Tibet, according to my opinion. China can transport and deploy regular troops on the Tibetan plateau.
    I don’t feel that China wants to attack India, but I do feel that India should raise the 17 mountain strike corps. Mountain troops perhaps focus on military operations in mountainous terrain. If such troops train and are deployed in large numbers, then they have many advantages over regular troops in certain scenarios. Such troops must regularly study and reflect on how to operate in mountainous conditions as advantageously as possible.
    On the China-India relationship, it seems the prevailing perception is that two strong neighbours are likely to aggravate the sentiments of each other, particularly if their armies are in contact of communication on the border. This is not the case in Western Europe, where neighbouring nations are allied to each other. I wonder how easy it would be for China to ally with her neighbours. Military rivalry does not arise on it’s own accord. There are other other reasons that further military considerations. On the matter of Arunachal Pradesh, perhaps China feels that Tibetans can infiltrate into India and back, because of their will towards the activity. There are ethnic Tibetans in Arunachal Pradesh who don’t agree with Chinese authority in Tibet, perhaps. China might wonder on what India will do, if a sizeable number of people on the Indian side of the border want to act against China.

  3. I had written an article for Indian Defense Review in 1998 (published in 1999) advocating raising of two Mountain Strike Corps, one each for Kashmir and North-east. Am happy to see some progress towards that end.

  4. Rafale Fighter planes are urgently required for complimenting the Mountain Strike Corps. Rafales have excellent Interdiction Bombing Capabilities ( as proven in Libya ). This is required to neutralize PLA ‘s supply routes in Tibet.

    An independent Tibet is required as a strategic buffer between India and China.

    • During Second World War Long Range Allies ( USA , UK ) Bombers took off from air bases in our Northeast , crossed Himalayas and bombed Japanese positions in China.

      Nehru dismantled many of these precious Defence Assets.

  5. for all the talk that China Pakistan nexus is dangerous for India China also has doubts on pak as Chinese terrorist organizations get their training from pak terror groups. China has a big problem dealing with ughur Muslims of ne region who recently killed 33people In a railway station in China. China’s biggest rival is the US and not us and considering us almost encircles China from South Korea to now Phillipines the last thing it wants is for us to join hands with the US. that would be doomsday for them as it would complete the American pivot in Asia.

  6. A bit of a negative view.

    I have a bit of dispute with author’s hypothetical view that Chou En Lai, advised Ayub Khan to build a militia force like LET to fight a prolonged war with India in 1960s. That is the time frame when Ayub was advising Nehru of a joint Defence of Kashmir, against the Chinese aggression. Also, that was just the time that Chinese began to build bridges with Pakistan. On their initial contact, it is unlikely that the Chinese would advise Pakistan to build this ill fated militia. The latter has hurt Pakistan more than it has hurt India as Pakistani Taliban is doing it now.

    Yes, the author is right that mountains absorb troops. He tends to suggest that new strike corp troops will be too little . I disagree with the author that this theory is applicable to India only. It is more applicable to Chinese troops more who would cross the inhospitable passes of the McMohan line and then attack the Indian defence line. The same mountains would absorb Chinese troops like a hungry shark. No amount of Chinese troops would be sufficient to make a dent in India’s defences. Today, India is well prepared. Those days of November 1962 are behind us. Chinese seem to know that better than Indian opinion makers.

    I am quoting Chou En Lai during his 1960/61 trip to India:

    “We must have self confidence, what others can do, we can also do, certainly better than they.”

    Have confidence in yourself; Chinese have other obligations in Taiwan, Korea, Vietnam, Japan, Russia and greatest of all the threats to China the US 7th fleet. They prefer to concentrate there than on Tibet and India. Also never forget that Chinese are the greatest propagandists also.

    • Hari, You are underestimating the Chinese. They are well aware of their problems mainly the logistic ones in Tibet and are moving real time to over come them. They have a rail link to Lhasa – this isn’t an exercise in tourism; its a strategic move to rapidly build up logistics. They further plan to move this rail line to Sinkiang through Aksai Chin. They have up graded all their Air Fields in Tibet to 10000 ft runways. They have gone in for large scale development of agricultural farms in Sinkiang. Their road communication in Tibet and Sinkiang is very well developed and improved. What we face is modern Chinese Army, not the rag-tag mass run by political leaders.

More Comments Loader Loading Comments