IDR Blog

Is Exporting Terror Pakistan’s National Policy?
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
Dr Sudershan Kumar | Date:10 Dec , 2017 8 Comments
Dr Sudershan Kumar
former DG, DRDO

Release of Hafiz Saeed from house arrest just 4 days before 26/11 Mumbai attack’s 9th anniversary is symbolic of Islamabad’s hypocrisy in tackling terrorism on its own land. This is a firm sign of proximity between Pakistani army, its powerful spy agency Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) and Hafiz Saeed, whom they consider their strategic asset against India. This release further substantiates the dwindling power of the civilian government and an imminent future role of radical islamists groups in parliament. The release was facilitated on the grounds of paucity of evidences even though a dossier of concrete proof was dispensed by the Government of India to Pakistan. The prime suspect of Mumbai attack and a U.N. designated global terrorist raises eyebrows about Pakistan’s sincerity in dealing with and containing terrorism.

Furthermore, his release from Jail can be seen as an eye opener for the international community whom, Pakistan is hoodwinking on the issue of terrorism and dismantling of terror structures. But this is not the first time when Pakistan’s double standard in dealing/sponsoring terrorism has been divulged in front of the global community as even earlier also it has behaved in a dicey manner. Time and again Pakistan’s soft approach towards terrorism has been evident notable being the inaction against Jaish-e- Mohammed leader Maulana Masood Azhar, a main culprit behind Pathankot Airbase terror attack.Even the Americans now seemingly recognize Pakistan’s backing of terrorism where in the past, the Pakistani army and ISI dodged Americans about the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden, the main culprit of 9/11 attacks on USA.

Pakistan was a close ally of the NATO alliance and had vowed to extend all logistic support to the NATO alliance in their offensive in Afghanistan against the dreaded terrorist but ultimately Americans traced Osama bin Laden at  Abbottabad in Pakistan and killed him then and  there under “Operation Neptune Spear” with Geronimo as the code word for Laden’s capture/death. Pakistani army and ISI have been the main facilitator and are bent upon creating disturbance through terror attacks in Afghanistan by aiding Haqqani, Taliban and Al Qaeda terror groups from its soil. Besides Pakistan has also extended support to terror groups who are carrying out terror attacks in Bangladesh. This was further confirmed when the representatives of Afghanistan and Bangladesh raised their voice in the 72nd United Nation General Assembly session in New York against Pakistan for its support to terror groups  operative in their respective countries. Therefore, Pakistan’s endurance and it acting as a safe haven towards various terror groups forces one to think that terrorism is a state policy of the Pakistani Government.

The reason why Pak army and ISI are involved in producing tribesmen, guerilla’s Mujahideen, Jahidis, and militants to export to neighbouring countries viz India Afghanistan and Bangladesh can be manifold primarily being that may be they are constrained to do so at the instance of religious hardliners, fundamentalists and others with whom the Pakistani society is plagued with. To find an answer one will have to turn the pages of seven decade old history, way back to the year of 1947 when Pakistan was born as an insecure state based on religion and  hatred towards Hindus. Therefore, Pakistan has always viewed India as an existential threat, a foe and this paranoia against India determines its policy. Therefore, in order to overcome this psycho fear Pakistani army adopted an important doctrinal shift towards guerilla warfare and ironically received training from USA which it gave with the aim of using Pak army to curtail communism.

The training incorporated the art of infiltration, preparing people’s army as a second line of defence and use of published literature to create awareness among their troops. In general, in any guerllia warfare three concepts are adopted. These include terrain, political situation of the state and the natural conditions. Therefore Pak army’s strategy has always been to adopt these tactics against its neighbours especially India to settle issues which otherwise could have been resolved through dialogue.

Hence, there are many glaring examples of Pakistan poking its nose in the internal affairs of Afghanistan by pushing political Islamists and Islamic militia. Parallely, Pakistan had adopted the same tactics of pushing tribals, tribes men in India to capture Jammu and Kashmir in the year 1947. Their attacks were successively repulsed by valiant Indian troops pushing them back till ceasefire was declared. Again in 1965, Pak dictator General Ayub Khan adopted the same strategy of first pushing guerillas to Jammu and Kashmir to foster internal disturbance and then launched  major  offensives at Chamb sector of Jammu Division but again Pak army suffered crushing defeat at the hands of Indian security forces.

Further in East Pakistan, state supported Islamist militants fought insurgents during crack down that ultimately led  to 1971 war. Besides, political scholars, experts and analysts had the view that Pak dictator General Zia ul Haq had adopted this approach of pushing terrorists in Afghanistan to fight against Soviet troops. This he did at the instance of USA, Saudi Arbia and other muslim world, who were against Soviet intervention in Afghanistan. This was the time when General Zia ul Haq opened Madrasas, effectuated terror infrastructure and leaned towards fundamentalism, radicalization and fanaticism. He even went on to the extent of islamification of army and forged a close relationship between Jihadies, hardliners and army.

After Soviet with drawl these Afghan missionaries and hard liners were turned towards Jammu and Kashmir to cherish his dream of capturing Jammu and Kashmir by creating unrest there.All these events laid down the path for the genesis of various terror infrastructures  like Hizbul Mujahideen, Jaishe e Mohammad (JeM) and Lashker e Taiba (LeT) which then initiated the pushing of these militants in valley for executing and propagating terror activities. Besides during this period Pakistani’s spy agency ISI extended support to Khalistan movement and various insurgent organizations who were active in Northern region of India.

Ever since Pakistan’s policy planners especially army and ISI, who have the main say and the final word in deciding Pakistani’s foreign policy for south Asia, have embraced the approach of exporting terror to its neighbours viz. India, Afghanistan and Bangladesh through nurturing terror organizations existing in Pakistan. It is also important to note that the successive Pak rulers both civilian and dictators had adopted approach of nurturing terrorism, fundamentalism and fantacism instead of development in their areas.

As a result there has not been much development in Pakistan provinces but there is a complete dominance and preponderence of hardliners and fundamentalists in Pakistani’s day to day affairs. The recent example is the resignation of Pak Law Minister Zahid Hamid at the behest of religious party Tehreek-i-Labaik ya Rasool Allah(TYLRA), whose thousands of supporters were holding protests in Islamabad and other parts since three weeks. These protests were mainly against the changes brought in Law related to the Khatm-i-Nabawwat (finally profit hood) oath in election in 2017. They alleged that his action undermines Islamic belief and is linked it to blasphemy. Pakistani government at the instance of its army succumbed to the pressure and accepted all  demands of  hardliners including the resignation of minister. This must be considered as a big win of hardliners in Pakistan’s multi ethnic society.

The author is of the view that Pak government, its army and ISI have been actively pursuing the policy of state sponsored terrorism and exporting terror to its neighbors viz. India, Afghanistan and Bangladesh  to use it as a tool to seek dominance over them rather than waging full scale war. Its nuclear umbrella further emboldens its army and ISI  to pursue the policy of exporting terror to their neighbouring countries  without realizing its intricacies and repercussions. This  approach is  leading Pakistan towards self destruction. The further radicalization of the multi ethnic Pakistani society will lead to  an evolution of volcano with hatred and violence buried underneath. If this volcano erupts , its lava will pulverise the whole society with ripples also having some impact on its immediate neighbours. Further Pakistan will face complete segregation from the world community except from China which has a colonial eye on it’s assets.

It is high time that Pakistan’s decision makers and policy planners must introspect their misdeeds and wrongdoings and where it will lead them to. They should work out a developmental plan instead for their country, which would be profitable to their younger generations instead of spending their energy in promoting terrorism, fundamentalism and fanaticism.  Other wise the international community and the world would recognise Pakistan either as a Terroriststan or a failed state.


Rate this Article
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
The views expressed are of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of the Indian Defence Review.

Post your Comment

2000characters left

8 thoughts on “Is Exporting Terror Pakistan’s National Policy?

  1. Extremely well written article bringing out the reasons and compulsions for the tensions and conflicts between India and Pakistan. The article contains well researched facts and presented in a systematic and analytical manner. Pakistan’s military and ISI and religious organizations have been fundamentally responsible for spreading Islamic fundamentalism. The civilian govenrment has always been dummy. The article is highly relavent in today’s context.

  2. A very good article on Pakistan”s role to breed and export Terrorism in the neighboring countries a s part of the state Policy. Role of Pakistan’s military, ISI and religious organizations to spread Islamic fundamentalism has been critically analysed.

  3. A well researched and written article clearly exposing the nefarious design of Pak and their modus operandi in waging a covert war against India. No doubt a rogue nation like Pakistan has nothing better to do or learn from history. Their hatred and vendetta against India defines their existence and survival. It’s high time that Pakistan shuns violence and invest it’s energy and resources for the betterment of its citizens.

  4. Excellent article. It is a well known fact that the civilian government in Pakistan is a dummy govt and Army call the shots. Pakistan is rightly described as an Army in search of a country. Pak Army knows that its survival depends only by keeping alive the conflict with India. Since they neither have the means or guts for an open conflict, exporting terror suits their policy as a low cost low risk measure. Thanks to the author for such in depth analysis.

  5. The author is very right in his perception, based on deeds of Pakistan right from the date of its inception in 1947, that it has played an active role to destabilize Democratic India. until 70’s they tried to wage loosing wars i.e. in 1948,1965 and 1971 while adopted the policy of fighting asymmetric wars through fundamentalist and fanatic Muslims from India and Pakistan resulting in colossal
    men and materials,loses particularly in Kashmir state of India. I don’t think Pakistan realizes its self destruction process in this way and any good sense will prevail to check it.

  6. Very beautiful analysis has been made. I should submit that why not we approach the international court with full of evidences, whatever we have made a dossier and given to Pakistan for hoping of impossible justice.

More Comments Loader Loading Comments