IDR Blog

Chinese Prime Minister’s visit to India
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
B Raman | Date:15 May , 2013 3 Comments
B Raman
Former, Director, Institute for Topical Studies, Chennai & Additional Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat. He is the author of The Kaoboys of R&AW, A Terrorist State as a Frontline Ally,  INTELLIGENCE, PAST, PRESENT & FUTUREMumbai 26/11: A Day of Infamy and Terrorism: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow.

Prime Minister Li Kequiang of China, who took over in March last, is to visit India, Pakistan, Switzerland and Germany during his first round of overseas visits after taking over as the Prime Minister.

His clubbing together his visits to India and Pakistan on his way to Europe indicates the equal importance which the newly-elected Chinese leadership attaches to China’s relations with India and Pakistan.

…why did the Chinese troops intrude into this area even at the risk of their intrusion casting a shadow on the first visit of their new Prime Minister to India?

The visit to India from May 19 to 21 threatened to come under a cloud following the intrusion by a platoon of PLA troops into Indian territory in the Daulat Beg Oldie area of Eastern Ladakh on April 15 and their camping in tents there for nearly three weeks.

The resulting stand-off between Chinese and Indian troops of the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) created trans-Line of Actual Control tensions and led to demands in India for the postponement of the visit of our Foreign Minister Salman Khurshid to Beijing to make preparations for Li’s visit. The stand-off also revived the distrust of China in Indian strategic circles.

The two countries managed to avert an embarrassing postponement of the visits by agreeing on the restoration of the status quo ante. The Chinese troops then vacated the Indian territory into which they had intruded.

Two questions remain unclear. Firstly, why did the Chinese troops intrude into this area even at the risk of their intrusion casting a shadow on the first visit of their new Prime Minister to India? Secondly, was there an Indian quid pro quo for the Chinese withdrawal? Sections of the Indian media had reported that India had agreed to remove some temporary infrastructure like bunkers for sheltering patrolling Indian troops from its territory. If media accounts of the quid pro quo are correct, it could ultimately turn out to be to the detriment of our sovereignty claims in that area.

While the Ministry of Defence of the Government of India has been a little more forthcoming on the Indian right to build defensive and logistics infrastructure in our territory, the Ministry of External Affairs has been evasive.

Ever since Xi Jinping took over as the General Secretary of the Communist Party of China (CPC) in November last year, he has been talking of the need for a border settlement “as early as possible.”The previous leaderships used to talk of the need for time and patience in reaching a border accord and for not allowing this to come in the way of the development of the bilateral relations in the economic and other fields. India had been going along with this formulation of the past leaderships.

The recent intrusion, could be interpreted as an attempt by the new leadership to press the need for a solution “as early as possible” without letting the negotiations drag on endlessly.

From the various remarks of Xi on Sino-Indian relations since he took over, it would seem that he wants a time-frame for finding a border accord without allowing the pressure for a time-frame coming in the way of strengthening relations in other fields. The recent intrusion, in this regard, could be interpreted as an attempt by the new leadership to press the need for a solution “as early as possible” without letting the negotiations drag on endlessly.

It would be in India’s interest too to work for a border accord “as early as possible.”At the same time, India should not accept the Chinese formulation that the absence of a border accord should not come in the way of the economic and other relations. This formulation has immensely benefitted China.

Much of the delay till now has been due to Beijing dragging its feet on exchanging maps of the line of actual control, which has to be the first step. During the forthcoming visit of the Chinese Prime Minister, we should make it clear that we too want a border accord “as early as possible”, but this would depend upon the Chinese taking the first step of exchanging maps of the LAC which have to be the basis of further negotiations.

We should also make it clear that relations in the economic and other fields cannot improve without satisfactory progress in the border talks.

Rate this Article
Star Rating Loader Please wait...
The views expressed are of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of the Indian Defence Review.

Post your Comment

2000characters left

3 thoughts on “Chinese Prime Minister’s visit to India

  1. oN B.Raman’s
    1)” The two countries managed to avert an embarrassing postponement of the visits by agreeing on the restoration of the status quo ante.”
    Averting embarassment..whom are we fooling Mr Raman..Isnt it embarrassing that the IAS,IFS,MOD still want to yap yap after their yapping has failed on all fronts be it invasion of Indian territory or beheading of Indian soldiers. The ilk of the author has no embarrassment when Indians who have served the armed forces of India are taken as Chinese citizenship by China as they are from Arunachal pradesh, more embarrassing is the silence on this issue by India’s supreme commander the President due to the hibernation inculcated about the knowledge of the subject and wrong advise of the Babus. So Mr Raman about averting embarrassment,your statement is completely off track … or just as the whole of IAS,IFS and MOD , you are still in tune with’ close ones eyes and think no one is looking”syndrome. Isnt it embarassing that members of the armed forces hailing from AP have had their visit to China cancelled due to chinese pressure that they are actually Chinese.

    Catalyst to the embarassment is PM Manmohan Singhs remark of ” Its a localised action”. So if Delhi is taken, would and should one in the southern command see it as localised action and not bother about it?Obviously PM has been thrusted this sentence by the ilk you served by

    If analyses are necessary, they are on lines of why , on what basis, on what experience do unqualified people get jobs that fill in the IAS, IFS and the MoD..Starting from the President himself and on those who have occupied the seat of RAW in recent years spoiling the hard work of the likes of Mr Kao and Mag Gen SS Uban. If analyses are to be taken, its time to do it on lines of what makes India yap and not Act when Indian territory is compromised or when Indian soldiers are beheaded. Perhaps the analyses on the point at the beg of the paragraph will answer that

  2. Dear Mr. Raman,
    The language used by you and other south Indian who works for MOE & MOD are so similar and gives smell of cowardice & fattu.
    What makes you do this???
    Same goes with Menon both father n son.
    They are cowards to the core.
    Unless we change ourself , chinese bastards will never listen.
    Both MOD & MOE dont need people who compromise on INDIA.

    Have RAW courage & Long Tikas.

    Sincerely
    Jaydeep
    ** Made a huge mistake by buying CBRaw.

    • Jaydeep Chauhan: Your remarks are discriminatory. As far as south India / S Indians are concerned are far better than the north in all aspects of growth. You talk of language – ‘how do you smell cowardice and whats ‘Fattu’ – something related to body fat or obesity? Choose your words carefully.

More Comments Loader Loading Comments